NYC Muslim Terrorist Speaks From Hospital Bed, 4 Chilling Words Destroy Liberal Media Lies

Shortly after hearing that he killed 8 innocent people in lower Manhattan, Islamic terrorist Sayfullo Saipov smiled in his hospital and offered a chilling response to police officers. However, it only took the wounded ISIS jihadist 4 simple words to completely destroy the liberal media’s politically-correct lies.

Every time the tiny Muslim minority commits horrific terror attacks, the liberal media and Islamo-sympathizers run to the side of the Muslim community to defend it from an alleged “backlash” that never comes. Thanks to their protection, the vicious cycle continues — Muslims kill non-Muslims, Muslim brace for a backlash that never comes, non-Muslims are chastised, Muslim kill non-Muslims, and so on.

Disturbingly, the so-called “tiny minority of Muslim extremists” who obey the Quran’s violent commands are disregarded as misunderstanding peaceful Islam. However, it is these jihadists’ unadulterated understanding of Allah’s mandates that debunk the left’s tireless attempts to refute that these attacks are in any way Islamic.

As soon as the media caught wind that a truck had plowed through a crowd of Manhattan residents, killing 8, they immediately reported that the massacre was most definitely not a terror attack. Once information revealed that it was carried out by an Uzbeki Muslim migrant and ISIS recruit, whose name means “the sword of Allah” and who shouted “Allahu Akbar” during the attack, the media realized it could no longer hide his Islamic affiliation. However, it’s the jihadist’s 4 stomach-churning words that not only prove that Islamic terrorism in the U.S. will only increase but also that political correctness is literally killing Americans.

From his hospital bed, 29-year-old jihadist Sayfullo Habibullaevic Saipov proudly told authorities that he was “pleased with his actions” and had “no bones” about killing 8 innocent non-Muslims because it has earned him a place in Jannah, the paradise the Quran explains that Allah has reserved solely for Muslims who slaughter unbelievers. CBS News reports that Saipov also happily confessed that his only regret is that he did not kill more people, admitting that he would’ve mowed down more pedestrians if he hadn’t crashed into a school bus for children with special needs.

Saipov’s admission references several verses in the Quran, including 4:95 and 61:10-12, both of which state that Muslims who “fight in the cause of Allah with their wealth and lives” will receive a greater reward in paradise than peaceful Muslims, and 9:111, which explains that Allah is pleased with and will offer great reward to those who “slay and are slain.”

Quran (4:95) – “Not equal are those of the believers who sit (at home), except those who are disabled (by injury or are blind or lame, etc.), and those who strive hard and fight in the Cause of Allah with their wealth and their lives. Allah has preferred in grades those who strive hard and fight with their wealth and their lives above those who sit (at home). Unto each, Allah has promised good (Paradise), but Allah has preferred those who strive hard and fight, above those who sit (at home) by a huge reward.”

Quran (61:10-12) – “…That you believe in Allah and His Messenger (Muhammad), and that you strive hard and fight in the Cause of Allah with your wealth and your lives, that will be better for you, if you but know! (If you do so) He will forgive you your sins, and admit you into Gardens under which rivers flow, and pleasant dwelling in Gardens of’Adn- Eternity [‘Adn(Edn) Paradise], that is indeed the great success.”

Quran (9:111) – “Allah hath purchased of the believers their persons and their goods; for theirs (in return) is the garden (of Paradise): they fight in His cause, and slay and are slain…”
Despite the Quran explicitly and repeatedly instructing Muslims to kill unbelievers and the prophet Muhammad modeling this by ambushing and annihilating innocent non-Muslims, American Muslims are still denying not only the Quran’s calls to violence but Saipov’s understanding of them.

Mirrakhmat Muminov, an Ohio-based Uzbeki activist and blogger, told BBC News that he was close to Saipov when he arrived in the U.S. in 2010. Muminov explained that shortly after immigrating, Saipov “had no knowledge of the Quran” and was uneducated. Of course, whether this is true, Muminov fails to admit that after Saipov began fervently attending Majid Omar in Paterson, he began to understand the Quran’s commands to “kill the unbelievers wherever you find them,” which resulted in his dangerous devotion to Islam.

“Because of his radical views he frequently used to argue with other Uzbeks and moved to Florida. From then onwards I lost contact with him,” Muminov told BBC News.
Muminov falsely attributes Saipov’s willingness to carry out Allah’s commands to slaughter as “radical views,” despite the Quran mandating such violence. Of course, this is a worn out tactic used by Muslims to distance the most violent followers from Islam. As such, Muminov is either in denial or blatantly lying, the latter of which is permitted and encouraged in the Quran.

Quran (9:3) – “…Allah and His Messenger are free from liability to the idolaters…”

Quran (66:2) – “Allah has already ordained for you the dissolution of your oaths…”

Quran (3:54) – “And they (the disbelievers) schemed, and Allah schemed (against them): and Allah is the best of schemers.”
As expected, the authorities, mainstream media, and Muslim community once again claim that Saipov is a “radical” and “extremist” who mistook the Quran to invoke violence and oppression. In reality, he simply followed the Quran, perfectly carrying out its commands just as Muhammad, the only man Allah gave authority, modeled.

“This was now, a classic case of a radicalization of a domestic jihadist who associated with ISIS, and this is their new playbook,” New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo told “CBS This Morning” on Wednesday.
If following the Quran is “radical” and an act of terrorism, as authorities claim, then Islamic ideology itself invokes terrorism by that reasoning. If that is the case, its invocation and practice should be illegal.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *